A New Year

2013I usually don’t make New Year’s Resolutions, but I felt like doing it this year. There are a few simple ways that I know I can better myself, both physically and mentally. A New Year is a good starting point to set some goals, and forget about all of the failures of the past. Its a clean slate. I’ve got larger goals in a few years, (buying a home, for instance) but in the meantime, I might as well focus on some smaller things.

Dieting is easy for me. I can put on weight and lose it at the drop of a hat. I’ve been working out and dieting for years and I know my body well enough where (if I wanted to) I could lose 50 lbs in a few months and put it back on in a few more months. The New Year’s diet really has nothing to do with my weight; I’m comfortable in my body. But I could be healthier; not that I’m noticing any problems.

First things first – no more fast food, no more soda, no more alcohol. Its been a week, and this has already made an impact. I’ve cut out these things before, and I always have more energy when I do. But fast food is convenient, especially since I spend a lot of my time driving. The extra energy helps take the place of soda, which I mainly drink for the caffeine. And alcohol – well. I’m not a big drinker anyway, but I might as well cut that out too. It’ll at least save me some money.

I also plan to read a book a week for the rest of the year. So far, so good. Already read Russell Kirk’s “Edmund Burke: A Genius Reconsidered“. Next up – “America the Beautiful” by Ben Carson. This will be a way to take up some extra time since I won’t be spending it at bars or at restaurants. More time at home reading means less time out spending money that I could be saving.

Unfortunately, this also means that less time will be spent writing on this blog. Don’t worry – I’ll make enough time for the occasional blog post, but updates will come slower than last year. Which reminds me; its been over a year since this blog took off. Over 200 posts and nearly 20,000 views. Thanks everyone! Please feel free to comment on anything I write and share the blog with your friends. Suggestions are always welcome as well. ;-)

Here’s to another year in America; another year in Wisconsin.

Effects, Side Effects, and Unknown Causes

causation-and-correlationA lot has been said lately about whether or not various “gun control” laws have any real effect on murders, shootings, or crime in general. Most libertarians believe that laws to ban anything or control anything always result in side effects, and rarely ever achieve their desired outcome. But statistics can always be put together to show “evidence” of one thing or another. Most recently, the claim that crime dropped during a 1994-2004 assault weapons ban has come out. Of course, this fails to take into account that crime was falling before the ban ever took effect, and continued after it expired.

So, if the gun ban wasn’t the real reason behind the lower crime rate, what could have been? The book Freakonomics by Steven D Levitt and Stephen J Dubner offers some never thought about reasons. According to the book, abortion being legalized 20 years earlier meant that fewer poor children were out committing crimes in the 90s. Its a little messed up to think of it this way – but abortion killed criminals before they were even born.

Either that, or the rise of video games may have had an effect, though not the one you may think of. Violent video games are often linked with violent young people, but the 90s were a time of crime rates going down, while violence in video games went up. Actually, the link between growing video game popularity and crime may come from more young people sitting inside playing the games instead of being on the streets getting into trouble. At a time when N64 and Sega were strangling children with their “addictive” games, it meant that those kids were at home with their friends and parents, not on the corner with some gang members.

Maybe the rise in patriotism and militarism was responsible. After the Vietnam war, many Americans felt that our military was weakened, and could no longer get the job done. It was only after the great success of the Gulf War (1990-1991), largely to the credit of General Norman Schwarzkopf (RIP), that Americans began to feel a pride in their military again. Somehow, maybe guns weren’t toys anymore, and death and war became more serious. Could the respect for government and America’s armed forces have had an effect?

Or maybe the lower crime rates are just the result of an aging population. The baby-boomers made a lot of noise in the 60s; riots, protests, even terrorist actions (like Obama’s buddy, Bill Ayers). But by the 90s most of these people had settled down. Either that or they were in prison. Whatever the case, they weren’t out causing trouble the way they were “back in the day”. Sure, new criminals were coming up behind them, but not in the same numbers.

The size of the family unit changed drastically as well. In 1980 the average family unit size was 3.0, but by 2006 it was 2.6. Families have been getting smaller, meaning parents have more time to spend one-on-one with their children, possibly teaching them better values, which in tern leads them away from crime. The smaller families mean less rebelling, more money per child, and probably smaller class sizes as well. (Because we all know that smaller class sizes mean better education, right?)

chart-showing-the-decline-in-violent-crime-offenses-and-increases-in-video-game-sales-from-1996-2004-pictureJust for arguments sake, let’s say that half of people are criminals. That half of criminals played violent video games. And half of those criminals grew up in single parent homes. And half of those criminals are alcoholics. And half of those criminals live in poverty. And half of those criminals watched action movies. And half of those criminals had a chemical imbalance in their brains. And half of those criminals had a hang-nail at the time they committed a crime. What is the conclusion we then come to? We should have government provided hang-nail removal stations in every city in America. Hang nail removal is a right! No one should be forced to suffer from a hang-nail due to their inability to pay!

If we broke things down this way, we’d end up with a very small group of people who are actually affected by these issues. In the end, we judge people as individuals because everyone’s circumstances are unique. There are patterns, sure, but it makes more sense to deal with the individuals than to deal with the video games, guns, or whatever other scapegoat politicians give up to the public. There are always causes that we see, but there are more causes (and possibly more influential causes) that we never see. This is why it is foolish to pass giant blanket laws under the guise of “fixing” some problem with society.

The problem is not with society, or with guns, video games, TV violence, or “the media”. The problem is with humans. We are inherently flawed. We are born sinful. Life is not utopia, and it never can be. Life is struggle. Whatever laws they try to pass to make us feel more secure, ultimately are a limit on our liberty. And I, for one, do not wish to trade my liberty for security, not matter what effect it may have.

Mac vs PC (Still?)

I’m going completely off-topic for a moment. For the last few months, virtually everything I’ve written about has been related to politics. Due to a friend’s never-ending harassment on Twitter, I feel I need to use this blog to do a bit of “arguing” (for lack of a better word) in regards to computers, operating systems, and the whole “Mac vs PC” thing. Bear with me. The rest of this post is directed at one person – you know who you are!

I’m not really a “computer” guy. I have a computer (obviously) but I don’t really know much about them, nor do I care to. Some people like computers, some people like cars, some people like carpentry. I know a lot about politics and economics, a fair amount about music and exercise/diet. As far as computers go I am a consumer first and foremost. The specifications of computers mean as much to me as the specifications of the circular saw I recently bought. I don’t know anything about the saw, but it works, so I like it. The same goes for my computer.

macvspcCurrently, my computer is an Apple Macbook Pro 13” running OSX Snow Leopard. There has been at least one update since Snow Leopard, but I never bothered to upgrade because… it cost a whopping $30. Nah, I’m just lazy. The OS I’m using right now works perfectly for me. I like the keyboard shortcuts (“spaces”), I like having a row of icons at the bottom of my screen (“dashboard”), I like inverting the screen when I’m typing.

My work computers are all Windows – various versions of XP, 7, even an old computer still running 98! I constantly have problems with them. Freezing, slowness, glitches, etc. I know – this could be a problem with the software, with the whole IT system in general, or with a dozen other things. That isn’t the point. What I’m saying is that I use both OSX and Windows everyday. My family uses computers with Windows. I also have an iPhone, but I also have an Android tablet. I’m not an “Apple” guy, okay?

Because I’m not a computer tech, the only thing that matters to me (and the majority of consumers, by the way) is if I like a product. At the moment, my own experiences with both Windows and OSX, and Android and IOS, are that I like the Apple products and operating systems better. I have no glitches with my Apple phone or computer, but I have countless problems with my work computer, and a fair share of problems with my tablet (a tablet that is rated as one of the best on the market).

The price of these products is a non-issue. I don’t buy new gadgets that often, so spending a extra couple hundred dollars on one product or another isn’t a big deal. If a computer cost $5000, then yeah – I’d opt for a cheaper model, but paying $1200 for an Apple laptop instead of $800 for a Asus or HP laptop – eh, whatever. Not a big deal to me. It may be a big deal for some people; I understand.

My experiences are not unique. Apple has come in 1st place for user satisfaction for 8 years in a row! By and large, people love their Apple products, whether its a phone, tablet, or computer. In the end, isn’t this what matters? Consumers love Apple products, and these people don’t mind paying the higher price. Could they find a non-Apple product that meets their satisfaction the same? Its possible, but in the last 8 years it hasn’t been as likely. If a consumer doesn’t care about price, their best bet to attain “satisfaction” is to buy an Apple.

As a business, Apple is doing many things right, and their own profit numbers show it. By marketing their products as “elite” and “trendy” they have created a demand that supports a higher price. The customer satisfaction contributes to demand because people are willing to pay more for products that receive high reviews. The reason I bought my Macbook Pro was because a friend had one and he loved his. In fact, I know a number of people who have Macs, and they all love ‘em! Word of mouth is the best advertising, and word of mouth worked on me.

androidiosBecause of all-star advertising and great reviews from customers, Apple is able to sell tons of computers, phones and tablets, and all of them for high prices. This has boosted Apple’s profits exponentially. Apple has more cash on hand than any other business in the world. Apple could buy Wal-Mart! Apple has more cash on hand than the US government! As a business, Apple has done an amazing job. No one can argue with that. Profits and losses are the way the market tells a business whether it is doing something right or wrong, and Apple is doing something right.

In the end – who cares? We’re talking about computers here, not liberty. If someone buys a different computer or phone than I do, I don’t really care. I can only suggest products based on my experience with them. If my experience is good, I’ll tell people about it. If it isn’t, I’ll tell people about it. If I like Apple more than Microsoft, don’t blame me – blame Microsoft. Somehow they lost me as a customer and that is their fault, not mine. The customer is always right. But remember that each customer is unique, has different experiences with products, has different uses for those products, and has different knowledge that influences their decisions.

Notice that throughout this I didn’t bash Android or Microsoft. I’m pretty fair. I hope that Microsoft and Google come out with products that are better than Apple’s because it will force Apple to come out with better products. Competition is a great thing. It forces different companies to provide better products to win customers. Without Apple, would Microsoft or Google even have bothered getting into the smart phone and tablet and MP3 player business? Maybe, but would they have been pushed as far as they were? Probably not. If you love Android, thank Apple because Apple forced Android to put out better products, and vice-versa. Android forces Apple to up its game. Both Android and Apple force Microsoft to work on their own operating systems. Everyone benefits from competition, no matter what product they buy.

My experiences are mine, and yours are yours. As long as you like what you have and I like what I have, then what’s the problem? I’m not saying Apple is better, I’m saying that I like Apple better, and that is the only thing that matters.

Site Update 9/26/12

Just wanted to make point to address why posts have been coming less frequently. My schedule has been tied up with another project – the authoring of a book. I’m still in the first draft phase at the moment, but everything is coming along well. More info on this coming soon.

However, new  blog posts will continue, all be it at a slower rate. I’ll try to fit in enough time to write one post per week. In the meantime, “Like” my new Facebook page HERE and follow me on Twitter HERE. Lots of stuff is posted to both of those sites – stuff that’ll never see the official blog.

-Tim

Recommended Reading (7/9/12)

The whole Fast and Furious scandal is a bit of foreshadowing on what is to come should America re-elect Barry Obama. Despite what some may say about Obama neglecting to pursue any major gun control measures, his record is perfectly available to anyone who wishes to learn more. Obama and the 2nd Amendment just do not go together. It is because of this that its important to re-educate ourselves on the gun control issue.

Perhaps it is in our favor then to read a book that was written in the height of Bill Clinton’s anti-gun era in the 90s. Guns, Crime, and Freedom is the book to read. Written by Wayne LaPierre (Executive Vice President of the National Rifle Association), this book provides the reader with the know how to argue for freedom and against gun control.

When this book was written America had just passed the “Brady Bill”, which banned certain weapons – especially so-called “assault weapons”. LaPierre lays out the facts in clear English. Assault weapons account for about 2% of crimes. The ban on assault weapons wasn’t designed to lower crime, but to get the proverbial “foot in the door”. Brady Bill II showed exactly what was coming, (an virtual ban of most firearms, thereby eliminating the 2nd Amendment) and luckily it never passed.

LaPierre exposes just about every gun control fallacy, from waiting periods to licensing, concealed carry to children and guns. He then takes on the root of our crime problem in America – our lax justice system. Account after account is brought forth where criminals are placed back into society before they have serve their time, only to murder and rape again. Prisons DO work, and its time we thought about society more than of the criminal’s “feelings”.

Going back and looking at where we came from in the 90s can help us see the signs of another Brady Bill coming in the next four years should Obama be re-elected. The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen. Don’t think that the 2nd Amendment isn’t on their hit list. It is the 2nd Amendment that insures the rest of the Constitution, and you better believe they’re planning on attacking it.

On the Shoulders of Giants

Walter E Williams

Walter E Williams

I was thrilled to hear a familiar voice guest hosting Rush Limbaugh’s show today. I turned the program on a few minutes late at work. I had been listening to an old Dream Theater album, but turned it off when I realized that I was missing “the fastest 3 hours of radio”. The voice belongs to Walter E Williams, an author and economist. Not long after I started listening, Williams mentioned that the great Thomas Sowell would be making a guest appearance on the show in the 2nd hour. What a treat!

I quickly texted a friend who I know would be interested – the friend who introduced me to Sowell, and economics in general. Of course he’s a busy guy, regularly working 70+ hours a week as an outstanding recording engineer (with a number of songs actually on Billboard’s lists). Its nice when talk radio can flex its muscles and show off a bit. Talk radio isn’t just pundits rambling about the latest controversy. Often times it delves deep into America’s most troubling problems. Today, for instance, Williams talked about the social security debacle; how its going broke and won’t be around for many people in their 20s and 30s.

Williams was great. I hardly ever hear him on the radio, but when I do I listen up. The first time I heard him was when he was promoting his latest book, Race and Economics: How Much Can Be Blamed on Discrimination?, on the Mark Levin Show. The two of them got along wonderful, and you could hear the mutual respect in their voices. Mark is another host who goes beyond typical talk radio. Mark Levin worked in the Reagan administration, operates a law firm, and as such knows quite a bit about law and most importantly, the Constitution. He also regularly makes references to famous political theorists such as John Locke and Montesquieu.

Without a doubt, the talk radio trifecta (Limbaugh, Hannity, and Levin) have helped shape my views of the world. Notable libertarian economists such as Milton Friedman, Henry Hazlitt, and Thomas Sowell have also all influenced me. None of what I know (when it comes to politics or economics) is outside anyone else’s capabilities. Let’s be very clear here – 95% of what I know about history, economics, and the Constitution I learned on my own after my mandatory public education.

But learning for myself wasn’t enough. I found that what I learned I wanted to express to my friends and coworkers. Its weird to just start up a conversation about price controls, Marxism, or the 2nd Amendment. I was willing to take on the challenge, however. While driving to the bars on a Friday night I might turn on Mark Levin’s show (which for me goes from 9pm-12am). Or I might loan out copies of Sowell books. Or, just this last week, I gave out copies of the Constitution and Declaration as gifts for the Fourth of July. That oughta get the conversation going.

I’ve also extended my thoughts to the internet, to this very blog you’re reading right now. My thoughts aren’t just for people who know me personally. I feel I have something to offer people, and its more than likely that I don’t actually know all of them. Whoever you are, I hope you’re enjoying my ramblings as much as I’m enjoying writing them!

Milton Friedman

Milton Friedman

But like many other people, I know I’m standing on the shoulders of giants. Those who I’ve learned from are far more famous and respectable than I can dream to be. The most I can do to pay homage to them is let you know where I get what I’m talking about. Most of my ideas aren’t mine. They’re Thomas Sowell’s, or Milton Friedman’s, or Mark Levin’s. They say I can’t list them all – but I’ll try. Here’s goes – Shelby Steele, John Locke, F.A. Hayek, William Buckley, Wayne LaPierre, Edmund Burke, John Stossel, Ayn Rand, Henry Hazlitt, David & Rush Limbaugh, Mark Steyn, Adam Smith, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, John Lott, Mark Belling, Sean Hannity, Victor Davis Hanson, Burton Folsom Jr, Walter E Williams, Frederic Bastiat, and Andrew Breitbart. These are the giants whose shoulders I stand on.

The Declaration of Independence

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Happy Independence Day!
-Tim

Pitbulls Are Not the Problem

I’m a conservative, and I love my talk radio, but sometimes those guys can drive me nuts. I don’t mean with all of the negativity, or the political rhetoric – that’s why I listen to it. But sometimes these guys go off topic about something that they really know nothing about, and say things that completely contradict their so-called “conservatism”. Case in point – this afternoon local Milwaukee host Mark Belling went off on why pitbulls ought to be banned from the city.

This is an issue that I care about. Although I’m not a pitbull owner, I am a dog owner, and my breed is under attack almost as much as pitbulls. I own a 4 year old 95 lb rottweiler. She’s a lovable dog, has never shown aggression towards myself or anyone else, and yet is considered a dangerous dog because of her size and strength. Rotts and Pits tend to have stronger jaws than most other breeds and because of this people take advantage of the animals. People use these dogs as guard dogs, purposely mistreating them to make them aggressive and vicious.

Recently a man was walking his dog when a pitbull tried to attack his dog. He defended his dog but wound up with bad cuts to his arms and legs. The pitbull that attacked him was eventually shot by a police officer. This is a sad situation, and a horrible thing to happen to anyone, but we shouldn’t jump to conclusions. This man was walking in a ghetto-y part of Milwaukee. Chances are that the pitbull that attacked him was trained for fighting or guarding. The reason this dog attacked was because of the training (or lack of training, really) that it received – NOT because pitbull are inherently vicious.

Belling of course jumped on this incident and concluded that ALL pitbulls are vicious little monsters that cannot be trained. According to Belling, pitbulls should be banned from the city of Milwaukee, and if anyone wants to own one they should move to the country. What a horrible response! Needless to say, I’m really disappointed in the stance that he took. What conservative says that the government should decide what kinds of dogs people can and cannot own?

First, to assume that all pitbulls are bad dogs is the equivalent of assuming that all guns are evil. A dog is what its owner makes it. A great dog can be turned vicious if its owner is a moron, the same way a firearm can be turned into a deadly weapon if someone wants to rob a bank. Banning dogs is the same kind of idea of banning certain kinds of guns, based solely on the people who abuse them. There are many responsible pitbull owners who train their dogs and never have any incidents.

If someone claims that pitbulls should be banned based on the fact that most dog bites are from pitbulls, then I’d respond with statistics that show black people commit most violent crimes in Milwaukee. What kind of conclusion should I draw?? I won’t even say it – it’s insane! You can’t judge a dog by its breed any more than you can judge a person by the color of their skin.

Who is to say that banning these dogs would even solve the problem. The only people who would obey the laws would be people who weren’t the bad owners in the first place. Even if the pitbulls were eliminated from the city, idiots who like to fight dogs would just find a different breed to use – Rottweilers, Dobermans, Boxers, or whatever. Banning pitbulls won’t eliminate idiots from existing, and thats the real problem. What we should do is educate people about dogs, how to train them properly, and how to care for them.

Like so many other problems, this stems from broken homes and poor parenting. Kids don’t grow up in a loving household, and therefore they don’t know how to love and care for animals. The solution isn’t to attack the symptom by pushing good dog owners out of the city, or by euthanizing hundreds of good dogs. The solution is to have good homes, responsible parents, working schools, and strong communities. Government should work to help build strong families, which is the building block of a strong nation. Attacking these dogs is only attacking the victim.

Thoughts on 1 Timothy

I just finished the book of 1 Timothy again. I really like both 1 and 2 Timothy, but I kind of wish it wasn’t so. I feel lame telling people that my favorite book of the Bible is 1 Timothy when my name is Timothy. I guess I was just named correctly. It could be worse; I could be named Amos. I’m sure I’d have to undergo horrible ridicule as a child – “Amos anus” and so forth. Always look on the bright side, right?

Putting aside what could have been, I found it rather comforting to learn what 1 Timothy was all about – Paul giving instructions to a young man who was looking to be a leader of the church. Timothy looked up to Paul, and Paul gave him excellent advice in the two letters he wrote – 1 Timothy and 2 Timothy.

While I’m no Bible thumper, and I’m hardly an expert in theology, I do enjoy reading this stuff and sharing what I learn. Although many people are much smarter than I am when it comes to religion, please bare with me as I share a few great verses I read recently. Maybe this is a repeat for you, maybe you’ve forgot it, or maybe you’ve never read it yourself. Take it or leave it.

Here is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance; Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners – of whom I am the worst.
1 Timothy 1:15

Paul says upfront – this is important. What he’s about to say needs to be taken seriously and literally. Jesus came to the world to save sinners. There are a number of ways to look at this. First, Paul doesn’t specify which sinners Jesus came to save; he just says “sinners”. Isn’t that ALL of us? We’re all sinners, and Jesus came to save everyone, not just people of a certain background or certain heritage.

Secondly, Paul wants Timothy to learn from Jesus. If we look back into Jesus’ time, he wasn’t hanging out with the kings of the land. He wasn’t hanging out with celebrities and rockstars. He was having dinner with the poor, the elderly, the sick. Too often today we think that to be a follower we need to push away people from our lives. Thats not what Jesus did. What we ought to do is reach out to the people who need Jesus most, even if they are seen as horrible people. Jesus had a number of personal conversations with prostitutes, did he not?

For physical training is of some value, but godliness has value for all things, holding promise for both the present life and the life to come.
1 Timothy 4:8

Did Paul seriously just smash the meaning of my life to pieces? I’ve spent so many hours on exercise and diet and all of that stuff – just to have Paul say it isn’t important? Well, no. Paul admits that there is value in training your body; keeping it healthy and so forth. What he’s saying is that we shouldn’t be short sighted and overlook the most important thing – training our hearts. We all die – our bodies will turn to dirt. Our souls, on the other hand, last forever.

Do not rebuke an older man harshly, but exhort him as if he were your father. Treat younger men as brothers, older women as mothers, and younger women as sisters, with absolute purity.”
1 Timothy 5:1

Isn’t this the key to having great relationships? Paul is telling Timothy that if he wants to be a leader he needs to be worthy of respect, and they only way you get respect is by giving it. Treat your elders well, and treat those younger than you as though they were your siblings; look after people. If we are to be leaders we need to look after those in our life the way a shepherd looks after his flock of sheep.

Meh. Just a few things I took away from that book. Its some really great reading, and I encourage everyone to pick up their Bibles soon and read it. Only a few chapters long – a half hour of reading should be enough to get through it, but I recommend more. Its good to sit and think about what is being said, and realize the deeper meaning.

Road Trip Pictures

Well, then. Since I just got back from a long trip across the country, I’m going to ease back into this blogging thing with a few pictures. (Click the images to see larger versions.) Enjoy!

US - Mexican Border in El Paso

US – Mexican Border in El Paso

Chico's - El Paso

Chico’s – El Paso

Bourbon Street - New Orleans

Bourbon Street – New Orleans

French Quarters - New Orleans

French Quarters – New Orleans

Grand Canyon - Arizona

Grand Canyon – Arizona

Grand Canyon - Arizona

Grand Canyon – Arizona

A lizard

A lizard